Lansen Naeve Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Lansen Naeve Corp. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 479

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lansen Naeve Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 91 →

United States Customs Court·Decided April 24, 1957·No. No. 60684; protests 230070-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise in question are, in fact, parts of machine tools, being multi[480]*480purpose machine vises and spare parts thereof; that said vises are not hand tools; that they are composed wholly of metal; and that they are used exclusively to hold metal material which is to be worked upon by a power-driven tool, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise in question are, in fact, parts of machine tools, being multi[480]*480purpose machine vises and spare parts thereof; that said vises are not hand tools; that they are composed wholly of metal; and that they are used exclusively to hold metal material which is to be worked upon by a power-driven tool, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Lansen Naeve Corp. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 479 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 479 (Lansen Naeve Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.