Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 325

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 19, 1956

DocketNo. 59664; protest 268225-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 325 (Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 325 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of machines operating by other than hand power which employ a tool for work on metal. In enacting the Tariff Act of 1930, Congress included within the terms of the basic act the following definition of “machine tools”: “That machine tools as used in this paragraph shall be held to mean any machine operating other than by hand power which employs a tool for work on metal.” On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of machines operating by other than hand power which employ a tool for work on metal. In enacting the Tariff Act of 1930, Congress included within the terms of the basic act the following definition of “machine tools”: “That machine tools as used in this paragraph shall be held to mean any machine operating other than by hand power which employs a tool for work on metal.” On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cust. Ct. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansen-naeve-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1956.