Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 325
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 91 →
United States Customs Court·Decided January 19, 1956·No. No. 59664; protest 268225-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of machines operating by other than hand power which employ a tool for work on metal. In enacting the Tariff Act of 1930, Congress included within the terms of the basic act the following definition of “machine tools”: “That machine tools as used in this paragraph shall be held to mean any machine operating other than by hand power which employs a tool for work on metal.” On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 325 (cusc 1956).
36 Cust. Ct. 325 (Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.