Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 211

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 91 →

United States Customs Court·Decided July 7, 1955·No. No. 59213; protest 244338-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

[212]*212Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was offered in evidence wherein it is stated that, following the customs regulations, the merchandise would now be liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1607 and that, the collector’s period of review having expired, he would have no objection to a stipulation to that effect. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[212]*212Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was offered in evidence wherein it is stated that, following the customs regulations, the merchandise would now be liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1607 and that, the collector’s period of review having expired, he would have no objection to a stipulation to that effect. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 211 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

35 Cust. Ct. 211 (Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.