Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States
This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 211 (Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[212]*212Opinion by
At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was offered in evidence wherein it is stated that, following the customs regulations, the merchandise would now be liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1607 and that, the collector’s period of review having expired, he would have no objection to a stipulation to that effect. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Cust. Ct. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansen-naeve-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1955.