Lamb v. Astrue
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1725
ROBERT EMERSON LAMB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:07-cv-000082-RBS-TEM)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Emerson Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Robert Emerson Lamb appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and
dismissing it for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000) because it was not filed in a timely
manner. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lamb v. Astrue, No. 4:07-cv-00082-RBS (E.D. Va. June 19,
2008). We deny his motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lamb v. Astrue (Lamb v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.