Lamb v. Astrue
This text of 267 F. App'x 306 (Lamb v. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Emerson Lamb appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction because he failed to exhaust the required administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Lamb v. Astrue, No. 4:07-cv-00021-RBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
To the extent we may properly consider Lamb's constitutional challenge to the statutory and regulatory provisions setting a limit on insured status for disability insurance claimants, we find the claim meritless.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 F. App'x 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-astrue-ca4-2008.