Lamb v. Astrue

251 F. App'x 844
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lamb v. Astrue. Read the opinion of the Court — 290 F. App'x 607
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2007·No. No. 07-1807·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Emerson Lamb appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lamb v. Astrue, No. 4:07-cv-00020-RBS (E.D.Va. August 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamb v. Astrue, 251 F. App'x 844 (4th Cir. 2007).

251 F. App'x 844 (Lamb v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related