Lamb v. Astrue

273 F. App'x 217
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lamb v. Astrue. Read the opinion of the Court — 290 F. App'x 607
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 9, 2008·No. 07-2114·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Emerson Lamb applied to proceed in forma pauperis. After Lamb filed the Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit and answered each question asked, the district court denied in forma pauperis status, stating that Lamb had sufficient income to pay a filing fee. Lamb was last employed in January 2007, and now receives disability benefits that, at their maximum, total $637 per month. Lamb asserted living expenses of $395 per month, but did not include in his expenses an accounting for medical care, clothing, gas, or other ordinary expenses beyond rent, food, and phone service. On this basis, we conclude Lamb is not able to pay the $350 filing fee. Thus, the district court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we grant in forma pauperis status on appeal, vacate the order of the district court, and remand with directions to allow Lamb to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamb v. Astrue, 273 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2008).

273 F. App'x 217 (Lamb v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.