Knoll v. Knoll

350 F.2d 407, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4606
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided August 23, 1965·No. No. 8140·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants file'd this action in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, alleging, in substance, that they lost their rights of inheritance in their parents’ farm in Kansas as a result of the fraud of the defendants. Upon timely motion, the trial court dismissed the action for lack of the requisite diversity of citizenship. The jurisdictional allegation of the complaint states that one of the plaintiffs is a citizen of the District of Columbia, and the other a citizen of the State of Illinois. It also recites that while some of the defendants are citizens of Kansas, other defendants are citizens of the State of Illinois.1 It is obvious there is no diversity of citizenship between the plaintiff and the defendants who are citizens of Illinois. It has long been held that diversity means “total diversity.” That is, all the parties on one side must have [408]*408citizenship diverse to those on the other side. Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 3 Cranch 267, 7 U.S. 267, 2 L.Ed. 435; Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co., 308 U.S. 66, 60 S.Ct. 44, 84 L.Ed. 85, rehearing denied 309 U.S. 693, 60 S.Ct. 464, 84 L.Ed. 1034; Wagner v. Flora, 10 Cir., 290 F.2d 508; 28 U.S.C. § 1332; 1 Moore, Federal Practice, ¶ 0.60 [8.-4, pp. 644-645; Wright, Federal Courts, § 24, pp. 71-72.

We are also in agreement with the trial court’s finding that all the parties are indispensable to the lawsuit, and that none could be dropped or realigned.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knoll v. Knoll, 350 F.2d 407, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4606 (10th Cir. 1965).

350 F.2d 407 (Knoll v. Knoll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Asselin v. Shawnee Mission Medical Center, Inc.
894 F. Supp. 1479 (D. Kansas, 1995)
Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Tuco, Inc.
156 F.R.D. 665 (D. Wyoming, 1994)
Merrigan v. Affiliated Bankshares of Colorado, Inc.
775 F. Supp. 1408 (D. Colorado, 1991)
Harris v. Illinois-California Express, Inc.
687 F.2d 1361 (Tenth Circuit, 1982)
Grimandi v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
512 F. Supp. 764 (D. Kansas, 1981)
Elders v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware
289 F. Supp. 630 (D. Minnesota, 1968)
Oppenheim v. Sterling
368 F.2d 516 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
Knoll v. Knoll
350 F.2d 407 (Tenth Circuit, 1965)