Strawbridge v. Curtiss

7 U.S. 267, 2 L. Ed. 435, 3 Cranch 267, 1806 U.S. LEXIS 331
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 13, 1806·Published·Cited by 1,957 cases

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. — The court has considered this case, and is of opinion, that the jurisdiction cannot be supported.

The words of the act of congress are, where an alien is a party, or the ■suit is between a citizen of a state where the suit is brought, and a citizen of another state.” The court understands these expressions to mean, that each distinct interest should be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to sue, or may be sued, in the federal courts. That is, that where the interest is joint, each of the persons concerned in that interest must be competent to sue, or liable to be sued, in those courts.

But the court does not mean to give an opinion in the case where several parties represent several distinct interests, *and some of those parties r,... are, and others are not, competent to sue, or liable to be sued, in the *- •courts of the United States.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 267, 2 L. Ed. 435, 3 Cranch 267, 1806 U.S. LEXIS 331 (1806).

7 U.S. 267 (Strawbridge v. Curtiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aurora Loan Services LLC v. Sadek
809 F. Supp. 2d 235 (S.D. New York, 2011)
City of Merced Redevelopment Agency v. ExxonMobil Corp.
674 F. Supp. 2d 494 (S.D. New York, 2009)
Umlic Consolidated v. Spectrum Financial Services Corporation
665 F. Supp. 2d 528 (W.D. North Carolina, 2009)
Urquhart v. Wertheimer
646 F. Supp. 2d 210 (D. Massachusetts, 2009)
Wagenmaker v. Amica Mutual Insurance
601 F. Supp. 2d 411 (D. Rhode Island, 2009)
Asplund v. IPCS WIRELESS, INC.
602 F. Supp. 2d 1005 (N.D. Iowa, 2008)
Colon v. Blades
570 F. Supp. 2d 204 (D. Puerto Rico, 2008)
Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC v. Segway Inc.
519 F. Supp. 2d 662 (E.D. Michigan, 2007)
Huber v. Taylor
519 F. Supp. 2d 542 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2007)
McKinnes v. American International Group, Inc.
420 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (M.D. Alabama, 2006)
Lincoln Property Co. v. Roche
546 U.S. 81 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Ntsebeza v. Citigroup, Inc.
346 F. Supp. 2d 538 (S.D. New York, 2004)
Vaka v. EMBRAER-EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE AERONAUTICA
303 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (S.D. Florida, 2003)
Impuls I.D. Internacional, S.L. v. Psion-Teklogix Inc.
234 F. Supp. 2d 1267 (S.D. Florida, 2002)
CFSC CONSORTIUM, LLC v. Ferreras-Goitia
198 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Puerto Rico, 2002)
Ferry v. Bekum America Corp.
185 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (M.D. Florida, 2002)
Eichmann v. Hunter Automated MacHinery, Inc.
167 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2001)