Klapprott v. United States

336 U.S. 942, 93 L. Ed. 1099, 69 S. Ct. 398, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2576
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 4, 1949·No. No. 42·Published·Cited by 164 cases

Opinion

The motion of the respondent to modify the judgment of this Court in this case is granted. The judgment announced January 17,1949 [335 U. S. 601, 616], reading as follows: “The judgments accordingly are reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with instructions to set aside the judgment by default and grant the petitioner a hearing on the merits raised by the denaturalization complaint.”, is amended to read: “The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to receive evidence on the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in petitioner's petition to vacate the default judgment entered in the denaturalization proceedings.”

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge dissent from the modification of the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klapprott v. United States, 336 U.S. 942, 93 L. Ed. 1099, 69 S. Ct. 398, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2576 (1949).

336 U.S. 942 (Klapprott v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Darby v. Shinseki
321 F.R.D. 10 (District of Columbia, 2017)
Spengler v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 338 (Federal Claims, 2016)
Austin v. Donahoe
307 F.R.D. 264 (District of Columbia, 2014)
In Re Aztec Supply Corp.
399 B.R. 480 (N.D. Illinois, 2009)
In Re Hansen
391 B.R. 896 (M.D. Florida, 2008)
Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. Nichols
885 N.E.2d 628 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2008)
In Re Coletta
380 B.R. 140 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2007)
Henriquez v. Astrue
499 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D. Massachusetts, 2007)
Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
388 F. Supp. 2d 601 (M.D. North Carolina, 2005)
United States v. Rebelo
358 F. Supp. 2d 400 (D. New Jersey, 2005)
United States v. Enigwe
320 F. Supp. 2d 301 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2004)
Baker v. John Morrell & Co.
266 F. Supp. 2d 909 (N.D. Iowa, 2003)
Fonner v. Overdorf
47 F. App'x 178 (Third Circuit, 2002)
Ames v. Miller
184 F. Supp. 2d 566 (N.D. Texas, 2002)
Coltec Industries, Inc. v. Hobgood
280 F.3d 262 (Third Circuit, 2002)
Williams v. American Overseas Marine Corp.
102 F. Supp. 2d 748 (S.D. Texas, 2000)
Valero Terrestrial Corp. v. Paige
211 F.3d 112 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)
DeBoer v. Village of Oak Park
86 F. Supp. 2d 804 (N.D. Illinois, 1999)