Kissel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
This text of 221 S.E.2d 645 (Kissel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this workmen’s compensation case the deputy director, and then the full board, found adversely to the claimant. The superior court affirmed the award. There being sufficient competent evidence to support the award, the judgment of the superior court affirming the award must be affirmed under the "any evidence” rule. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. New, 110 Ga. App. 596 (139 SE2d 343); Adams v. United States F. &. G. Co., 125 Ga. 232, 234 (1) (186 SE2d 784). "We equally apply the any evidence’ rule to claimants as well as to employers.” Continental Cas. Co. v. Weise, 136 Ga. App. 353, 355.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 S.E.2d 645, 136 Ga. App. 504, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kissel-v-aetna-casualty-surety-company-gactapp-1975.