Hardee v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance
This text of 251 S.E.2d 132 (Hardee v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The administrative law judge, and then the full board, found adversely to the claimant. The superior court affirmed the award. There was sufficient competent evidence to support the award, and under the "any evidence” rule the judgment of the superior court must be affirmed. The "any evidence” rule is applicable to claimants as well as to employers. Kissel v. Aetna Cas. &c. Co., 136 Ga. App. 504 (221 SE2d 645) (1975); Carroll v. Mission Ins. Co., 147 Ga. App. 262 (1978).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 S.E.2d 132, 148 Ga. App. 178, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 3113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardee-v-pennsylvania-national-mutual-casualty-insurance-gactapp-1978.