Insurance Co. of North America v. Hartl
Opinion
The appellants, employer and workers’ compensation [860] insurer, appeal the judgment of the superior court affirming an award by the State Board of Workers’ Compensation of continuing compensation for temporary total disability (Code Ann. § 114-404) as well as medical expenses.
The enumerations of error complain of misstatements of facts in the administrative law judge’s notice of award and the claimant’s failure to carry his burden of proving that he was incapacitated to work. Held:
There was sufficient competent evidence to support the award, and under the "any evidence” rule the judgment of the superior court must be affirmed. Hardee v. Pa. Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Ga. App. 178 (251 SE2d 132) (1978);Kissel v. Aetna Cas. &c. Co., 136 Ga. App. 504 (221 SE2d 645) (1975).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
256 S.E.2d 153 (Insurance Co. of North America v. Hartl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.