Kiobel Ex Rel. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
642 F.3d 268, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2200
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 4, 2011·No. Docket 06-4800-cv, 06-4876-cv·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinions
Chief Judge JACOBS concurs in a separate opinion.
[269] Judge CABRANES concurs in a separate opinion.
Judge LEVAL dissents in a separate opinion.
ORDER
A petition for panel rehearing having been made by Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, the petition is hereby DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kiobel Ex Rel. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 642 F.3d 268, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2200 (2d Cir. 2011).
642 F.3d 268 (Kiobel Ex Rel. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jesner v. Arab Bank
Second Circuit, 2016
In re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute Litigation
822 F.3d 34 (Second Circuit, 2016)
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC
671 F.3d 736 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
654 F.3d 11 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Orkin v. Swiss Confederation
770 F. Supp. 2d 612 (S.D. New York, 2011)
Kiobel Ex Rel. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
642 F.3d 268 (Second Circuit, 2011)