Kiobel Ex Rel. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
642 F.3d 268, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2200
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 2011
DocketDocket 06-4800-cv, 06-4876-cv
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 642 F.3d 268 (Kiobel Ex Rel. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kiobel Ex Rel. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 642 F.3d 268, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2200 (2d Cir. 2011).
Opinions
Chief Judge JACOBS concurs in a separate opinion.
[269]*269Judge CABRANES concurs in a separate opinion.
Judge LEVAL dissents in a separate opinion.
ORDER
A petition for panel rehearing having been made by Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, the petition is hereby DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jesner v. Arab Bank
Second Circuit, 2016
In re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute Litigation
822 F.3d 34 (Second Circuit, 2016)
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC
671 F.3d 736 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
654 F.3d 11 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Orkin v. Swiss Confederation
770 F. Supp. 2d 612 (S.D. New York, 2011)
Kiobel Ex Rel. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
642 F.3d 268 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
642 F.3d 268, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiobel-ex-rel-kiobel-v-royal-dutch-petroleum-co-ca2-2011.