In re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute Litigation
822 F.3d 34, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8538, 2016 WL 2620283
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 9, 2016
DocketNos. 13-3605, 13-3620, 13-3635, 13-4650, 13-4652
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 822 F.3d 34 (In re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute Litigation, 822 F.3d 34, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8538, 2016 WL 2620283 (2d Cir. 2016).
Opinions
ORDER
Following disposition of this appeal, an active judge of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. A poll having been conducted and there being no majority favoring en banc review, rehearing en banc is hereby DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Isaac v. Schiff
S.D. New York, 2023
Rosenberg v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
S.D. New York, 2023
Lateral Recovery, LLC v. Queen Funding, LLC
S.D. New York, 2022
Licci Ex Rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL
834 F.3d 201 (Second Circuit, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
822 F.3d 34, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8538, 2016 WL 2620283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-arab-bank-plc-alien-tort-statute-litigation-ca2-2016.