Home/District of Columbia Court of Appeals/Kim Long Ko v. United States

Kim Long Ko v. United States

694 A.2d 73, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 85, 1997 WL 229164
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 8, 1997
Docket93-CF-1322
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 694 A.2d 73 (Kim Long Ko v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kim Long Ko v. United States, 694 A.2d 73, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 85, 1997 WL 229164 (D.C. 1997).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion of Judge Sehwelb, except that a majority of the court does not adopt the discussion in Parts III-B. and III-C. (4) of Judge Schwelb’s opinion regarding the question whether the trial judge failed to comply with D.C.Code §§ 31-2704, -2711, and -2712 (1993). As to the interpretation of those provisions, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion of Judge Reid, with whom Judge Mack joins. Specifically, a majority of the court holds that there was error in these respects, but not plain error. Judge Sehwelb would hold only that there was no plain error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Richardson
759 A.2d 649 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
Kim Long Ko v. United States
722 A.2d 830 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1998)
Flores v. United States
698 A.2d 474 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)
Gonzalez v. United States
697 A.2d 819 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
694 A.2d 73, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 85, 1997 WL 229164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kim-long-ko-v-united-states-dc-1997.