Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation
This text of Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation (Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SIDENSE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________
2013-1009 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 10-CV-2066, Judge Susan Y. Illston. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARK L. HOGGE, SNR Denton US, LLP, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI, RACHEL REPKA, KHALIQ A. IMRAN and ANDREW BLAIR. Of counsel was JAMES A. KLENK.
ROGER L. COOK, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were ROBERT D. TADLOCK and SARA B. GIARDINA. Of counsel was JOSHUA HAMILTON LEE, of Atlanta, Georgia. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilopass-technology-inc-v-sidense-corporation-cafc-2013.