Gabriel Technologies Corp. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
This text of Gabriel Technologies Corp. v. Qualcomm Incorporated (Gabriel Technologies Corp. v. Qualcomm Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
GABRIEL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, AND TRACE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, SNAPTRACK, INC., AND NORMAN KRASNER, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________
2013-1058 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 08-CV-1992, Judge Anthony J. Battaglia. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MICHAEL E. SALZMAN, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was RONALD ABRAMSON. Of counsel was PETER A. SULLIVAN.
TIMOTHY S. TETER, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, Califor- nia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were JEFFREY S. KARR and LORI R. MASON, of Palo Alto, California, and STEVEN M. STRAUSS, of San Diego, California. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 18, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gabriel Technologies Corp. v. Qualcomm Incorporated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gabriel-technologies-corp-v-qualcomm-incorporated-cafc-2014.