Kendall DeJuan Simon v. State of California

District Court, C.D. California·Decided August 26, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-06656·Unknown

Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:21-cv-6656-VAP (MAR) Date: August 26, 2021 Title: Present: The Honorable: MARGO A. ROCCONI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Erica Bustos N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Defendants: N/A N/A Proceedings: (In Chambers) MINUTE ORDER RE: MOTION TO PROCEED IFP, DKT. 2

On August 7, 2021, Plaintiff constructively filed a Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”) and a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. ECF Docket Nos. (“Dkt(s).”) 1; 2. On August 16, 2021, the instant action was transferred from the Eastern District of California to the Central District of California. Dkts. 3; 4.

The Court requires certain information to rule on Plaintiff’s IFP Motion that is missing from either the Motion or the Complaint. Specifically, it is unclear whether: (1) Plaintiff is presently detained and currently awaiting trial; (2) Plaintiff was already convicted, sentenced, and imprisoned pursuant to his convicton and sentence; or (3) If Plaintiff was not convicted but remains civily committed at the Metrpolitan State Hospital. Plaintiff also fails to include his trust account information with his IFP Motion.

All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff's failure to prepay the entire fee only if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, “[u]nlike other indigent litigants, prisoners proceeding IFP must pay the full amount of filing fees in civil actions and appeals pursuant to the PLRA [Prison Litigation Reform Act].” Agyeman v. INS, 296 F.3d 871, 886 (9th Cir. 2002).

The filing fee provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) do not apply where the plaintiff was not a “prisoner” as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h) the time the action was filed. Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1122 (9th Cir. 2005); Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000) (“we hold that . . . the PLRA’s requirement that prisoner plaintiffs seeking to proceed in forma pauperis must provide copies of prisoner trust fund account statements” does not apply where plaintiff is detained not for his criminal conviction, “but rather a civil commitment for non-punitive purposes.” (emphasis added)). CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:21-cv-6656-VAP (MAR) Date: August 26, 2021 Title: For purposes of the PLRA, a “prisoner” is “any person incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms and conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h). A “civil detainee” on the other hand, is not a “prisoner” within the meaning of the PLRA. Andrews, 398 F.3d at 1122; Agyeman, 296 F.3d at 886 (holding that INS detainee not also facing criminal charges is not a “prisoner” under section 1915).

Plaintiff states that he was “released on charges” but that he now sits “5 years later still institutionalized for crimes [he] went to trial by judge [sic] and was found innocent on all charges [sic].” Dkt. 1 at 7. However, he provides no additional information to allow the Court to understand and verify his current status and whether he qualifies as a “prisoner” under the PLRA.

Thus, if Plaintiff is either presently detained awaiting trial, or if he was already convicted, sentenced, and is presently detained pursuant to his conviction and sentence, then Plaintiff will need to submit a new Form CV-60P that includes his trust account statements. If, on the other hand, Plaintiff’s present detention is pursuant to a civil commitment, then the Court will consider Plaintiff’s current IFP Motion, Dkt. 2.

Accordingly, Plaintiff must reply to this Order within twenty-one (21) days, by September 16, 2021, addressing his current detention status and whether he qualifies as a “prisoner” pursuant to the PLRA. If he does, Plaintiff must file a new Form CV-60P and include his trust account information. The Clerk of Court is instructed to include a new Form CV-60P for Plaintiff’s convenience.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

: Initials of Preparer eb UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER

PRISONER/PLAINTIFF, v- REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES WITH DEFENDAN'(S). DECLARATION IN SUPPORT

I, , declare under penalty of perjury, that the following is true and correct; that I am the prisoner-plaintiff in the above entitled case; that in support of my request to proceed without prepayment of fees under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915, I declare that because of my poverty I am unable to pay the full costs of said proceedings or to give security therefore and that I am entitled to redress. I further declare under penalty of perjury that the responses which I have made to the questions and instructions below are true, correct and complete. 1. Are you presently employed in prison? LYes LINo a. Ifthe answer is yes, state the number of hours you work per week and the hourly rate of pay:

b. State the place of your incarceration . Have the institution fill out the Certificate portion of this application and attach a certified copy of your prison trust account statement showing transactions for the past six months. 2. Have you received, within the past twelve months, any money from any of the following sources? a. Business, profession or form of self-employment? KYes LINo b. Rent payments, interest or dividends? KYes LINo c. Pensions, annuities or life insurance payments? KYes LINo d. Gifts or inheritances? KYes LINo e. Any other income (other than listed above)? LlYes LINo f. Loans? KYes LINo If the answer to any of the above is yes, describe such source of money and state the amount received from each source during the past twelve (12) months:

3. Do you own any cash, or do you have money in a checking or savings account? (Include any funds in prison accounts, if applicable.) Yes LINo If the answer is yes, identify each account and separately state the amount of money held in each account for each of the six (6) months prior to the date of this declaration.

4. Do you own any real estate, stocks, bonds, notes, automobiles, or other valuable property (excluding ordinary household furnishings and clothing)? L1Yes LINo If the answer is yes, describe the property and state it approximate value:

5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kendall DeJuan Simon v. State of California, (C.D. Cal. 2021).

Kendall DeJuan Simon v. State of California (Kendall DeJuan Simon v. State of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andrews v. King
398 F.3d 1113 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Page v. Torrey
201 F.3d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)