Kamilewicz v. Bank of Boston Corp.

100 F.3d 1348, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30388, 1996 WL 676729

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided November 22, 1996·No. No. 96-1019·Published·Cited by 28 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

A panel decided this case on August 8, 1996. On August 22, 1996, the plaintiffs-[1349] appellants filed a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en bane. Subsequently, the judges on the panel voted to deny the petition for rehearing, and a vote was requested on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A majority of the active members of the court have voted to deny rehearing en banc. Chief Judge POSNER and Circuit Judges EASTERBROOK, MANION, ROVNER, and DIANE P. WOOD voted to grant rehearing en bane.

It Is TheebfoRe ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is hereby Denied. Because a majority of judges voted to deny rehearing en banc, the suggestion to do so is also Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

A panel decided this case on August 8, 1996. On August 22, 1996, the plaintiffs-[1349] appellants filed a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en bane. Subsequently, the judges on the panel voted to deny the petition for rehearing, and a vote was requested on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A majority of the active members of the court have voted to deny rehearing en banc. Chief Judge POSNER and Circuit Judges EASTERBROOK, MANION, ROVNER, and DIANE P. WOOD voted to grant rehearing en bane.

It Is TheebfoRe ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is hereby Denied. Because a majority of judges voted to deny rehearing en banc, the suggestion to do so is also Denied.

Kamilewicz v. Bank of Boston Corp., 100 F.3d 1348, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30388, 1996 WL 676729 (7th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

100 F.3d 1348 (Kamilewicz v. Bank of Boston Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

3991 Transport Company Inc. v. Alexander

N.D. Illinois, 2020

In Re Subway Footlong Sandwich Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

869 F.3d 551 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)

Kent Eubank v. Pella Corporation

753 F.3d 718 (Seventh Circuit, 2014)

Thomas Riva v. Pella Corporation

Seventh Circuit, 2014

Arnold v. KJD Real Estate, LLC

752 F.3d 700 (Seventh Circuit, 2014)

Hartford Life Ins. v. Solomon

910 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (N.D. Illinois, 2012)

Vought v. Bank of America, N.A.

901 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (C.D. Illinois, 2012)

F.C v. Inc. v. Sterling National Bank

652 F. Supp. 2d 928 (N.D. Illinois, 2009)

Gener-Villar v. Adcom Group, Inc.

530 F. Supp. 2d 392 (D. Puerto Rico, 2007)

In Re: Rite Aid Corp

Third Circuit, 2005

Richard v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc.

355 F.3d 345 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)

Rogers v. Swepston

267 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D. West Virginia, 2003)

Reynolds v. Beneficial National Bank

260 F. Supp. 2d 680 (N.D. Illinois, 2003)

State v. Homeside Lending, Inc.

2003 VT 17 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2003)

Brown v. Damiani

154 F. Supp. 2d 317 (D. Connecticut, 2001)

Lecates v. Barker

Tenth Circuit, 2000

Victor Johnson v. Monica Rodrigues (Orozco) Sealed Defendant-98-550-1 Sealed Defendant-98-550-2 Adoption Center of Choice

226 F.3d 1103 (Tenth Circuit, 2000)

Johnson v. Rodrigues (Orozco)

Tenth Circuit, 2000

Oscar Cruz v. Melecio

204 F.3d 14 (First Circuit, 2000)

Stacey A. Williams, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc.

159 F.3d 266 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)