Jones v. State
117 S.E. 827, 30 Ga. App. 361, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 458
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ga. App. 635 →
Opinion
1. When on the trial of an indictment containing two counts the court instructs the jury not to consider one of the counts for the reason that the evidence does not authorize a conviction under it, a general verdict of guilty is properly treated as having been based on the count submitted to the jury. See Waver v. State, 108 Ga. 775 (33 S. E. 423).
2. The evidence in this case authorized the defendant’s conviction, and it was not error .to overrule the motion for a new trial.
■Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 117 S.E. 827, 30 Ga. App. 361, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 458 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
117 S.E. 827 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Waver v. State
33 S.E. 423 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)