Jones v. State

110 S.E. 409, 27 Ga. App. 643, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 339
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ga. App. 635
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1921·No. 12831·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

A conviction of burglary was fully authorized by the evidence, and the grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit.

If a fuller charge upon reasonable doubt or upon confession was desired, it should have been requested in writing and before the jury retired to consider their verdict. The charge of the court was fair and was a correct statement of the law as applicable to the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. James H. Dodgen, for plaintiff in error. diaries H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 110 S.E. 409, 27 Ga. App. 643, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 339 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

110 S.E. 409 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.