Jones v. State
110 S.E. 316, 28 Ga. App. 50, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 293
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ga. App. 635 →
Opinions
The defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence, the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and the newly discovered evidence was merely cumulative and impeaching, and would not likely produce a different result upon another trial. The record shows no errors of law in the trial of the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 110 S.E. 316, 28 Ga. App. 50, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
110 S.E. 316 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bowman v. State
22 S.E. 274 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Harper v. State
22 S.E. 276 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Fellows v. State
39 S.E. 885 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)