Jones v. State

110 S.E. 316, 28 Ga. App. 50, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 293
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 17, 1922
Docket12704
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 316 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. State, 110 S.E. 316, 28 Ga. App. 50, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence, the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and the newly discovered evidence was merely cumulative and impeaching, and would not likely produce a different result upon another trial. The record shows no errors of law in the trial of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowman v. State
22 S.E. 274 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Harper v. State
22 S.E. 276 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Fellows v. State
39 S.E. 885 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 316, 28 Ga. App. 50, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-gactapp-1922.