Jones v. State

111 S.E. 223, 28 Ga. App. 347, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 501
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ga. App. 635
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 7, 1922·No. 13180·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of forgery. The assignments of error upon the admission of testimony are without merit. The charge of the court was full and fair. The motion to declare a mistrial, as presented here, is also without merit. The defendant has had a legal trial and his guilt was abundantly established. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 111 S.E. 223, 28 Ga. App. 347, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 501 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 223 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.