Jones v. State

616 So. 2d 186, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4324, 1993 WL 100155
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1993·No. No. 92-0164·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s conviction for grand theft as the state failed to establish that the fair market value of the property exceeded $300.00. See Taylor v. State, 425 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). On remand the trial court should reduce the conviction to petit theft.

We find no error in the remaining issues but remand for resentencing in light of our reversal of the grand theft conviction.

DELL, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 616 So. 2d 186, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4324, 1993 WL 100155 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 186 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilbert v. State
817 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
I.T. v. State
796 So. 2d 1220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)