Jones v. State

567 So. 2d 16, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6608, 1990 WL 126375
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 1990·No. No. 90-2069·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s action in summarily denying Jones’s Rule 3.850 motion. The motion was legally insufficient. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to Jones’s filing a legally sufficient Rule 3.850 motion if he is so advised.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 567 So. 2d 16, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6608, 1990 WL 126375 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

567 So. 2d 16 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacobs v. State
567 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)