Jones v. State

562 So. 2d 860, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4512, 1990 WL 85452
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1914
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1990·No. No. 89-1726·Published

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

Charles Edward Jones appeals from a judgment and sentence for one count of sale of cocaine and one count of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, asserting the following issue for review: “Was the sentencing judge justified in sentencing the defendant above the sentencing guidelines, when he was not the judge that conducted the trial of the defendant, and did not give any reasoning for exceeding the sentencing guidelines?” Jones cites no authority for the proposition that a trial judge, who does not preside over a defendant’s trial, cannot sentence the defendant. Additionally, a review of the record indicates that the sentencing judge did not exceed the guidelines recommendation. He properly sentenced Jones within the permitted sentencing range.

AFFIRM.

BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 562 So. 2d 860, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4512, 1990 WL 85452 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

562 So. 2d 860 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.