Jones v. State

566 So. 2d 515, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2377, 1990 WL 64071
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1990·No. No. 89-1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

CONFESSION OF ERROR

The state properly concedes that the defendant was illegally sentenced beyond the' one cell increase permitted by the sentencing guidelines and that no written reasons were given to support the departure. See State v. Tuthill, 545 So.2d 850 (Fla.1989); Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 [516]*516(Fla.1989). Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:

Sentences imposed after revocation of probation or community control must be in accordance with the guidelines. The sentence imposed after revocation of probation or community control may be included within the original cell (guidelines range) or may be increased to the next higher cell (guidelines range) without requiring a reason for departure.

Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).

Therefore, the sentence is hereby vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with Rule 3.701(d)(14).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 566 So. 2d 515, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2377, 1990 WL 64071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

566 So. 2d 515 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Degrasse v. Wertheim
566 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)