Jones v. State
This text of 234 So. 2d 379 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals an order denying him relief under CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. Appellant’s motion to vacate reads as follows:
“Comes Now Naamon Jones in Per Se. moves that this Honorable Court Vacate his Judgment and Sentence Pursuant to the Allowances of Criminal Procedure Rule #1.850. Petitioner Alleges, that he was given 6 months for Contempt of Court for making frivolous accusation, on or about November 16, 1968. and ask that he be granted a hearing.”
It patently appears from a reading of appellant’s motion that it is entirely deficient in that it does not state any grounds for relief under CrPR 1.850. This being true, the appellant was not entitled to a hearing on his motion and the trial court was eminently correct in denying the appellant’s motion without a hearing. Harper v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 168 So.2d 325.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 So. 2d 379, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.