State v. Charles
This text of 519 So. 2d 10 (State v. Charles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of aggravated assault and unlawful discharge of a firearm, pursuant to a guilty verdict of the jury. Upon timely motion, a new trial was granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence.
It is contended by the state in this appeal that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a new trial. On the record, we find no merit in such contention. See Jackson v. State, 416 So.2d 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Jones v. State, 233 So.2d 432 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). Therefore the order appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
519 So. 2d 10, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2370, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10468, 1987 WL 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-charles-fladistctapp-1987.