Gaither v. Anderson

139 So. 587, 135 So. 840, 103 Fla. 1190
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 9, 1931·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged hy the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaither v. Anderson, 139 So. 587, 135 So. 840, 103 Fla. 1190 (Fla. 1931).

139 So. 587 (Gaither v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCallum v. State
559 So. 2d 233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Kline v. Belco, Ltd.
480 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Jackson v. State
416 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Jones v. State
233 So. 2d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Albrecht v. City of Hollywood
157 So. 2d 839 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Alston v. Shiver
105 So. 2d 785 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Ogburn v. Murray
86 So. 2d 796 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Douth v. State
85 So. 2d 550 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Fort Orange Co. v. O'Neal
189 So. 685 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Clair v. Meriwether
174 So. 591 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Anderson v. Gaither
162 So. 877 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Smith v. State
158 So. 91 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Williams v. Ray
144 So. 679 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)