Clair v. Meriwether
174 So. 591, 127 Fla. 841, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1459
Opinions
This writ of error was taken to a judgment for the defendant in an action to recover damages for an injury to a pedestrian on a highway. The verdict of the jury determined the facts in issue and the trial court denied a motion for new trial.
A careful consideration of the record discloses no reversible error of law or procedure in the trial. The judgment should be affirmed. • See Sections 4637 (2918), 4499 (2812) C. G. L.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clair v. Meriwether, 174 So. 591, 127 Fla. 841, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1459 (Fla. 1936).
174 So. 591 (Clair v. Meriwether) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Johnson
187 So. 2d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Dade National Bank of Miami v. Kay
131 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Alston v. Shiver
105 So. 2d 785 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Edwards v. Donaldson
103 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Ogburn v. Murray
86 So. 2d 796 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Baston v. Shelton
13 So. 2d 453 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Brandt v. Dodd
8 So. 2d 471 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Stiles v. Wright
32 N.E.2d 220 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Blue Gray Cab Co. v. Lowe, Et Vir
196 So. 425 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Greiper v. Coburn, Et Vir
190 So. 902 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Kimball v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
181 So. 533 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)