Johnson v. State
407 S.W.3d 149, 2013 WL 4520469, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 994
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1675 →
Opinion
ORDER
Timothy Johnson appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction case. On appeal, Johnson claims that the circuit court clearly erred in denying his motion because he was entitled to reopen the Rule 29.15 proceedings in that he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 407 S.W.3d 149, 2013 WL 4520469, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 994 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
407 S.W.3d 149 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.