Johnson v. State

397 S.W.3d 508, 2013 WL 1135777, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 334
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1083
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 19, 2013·No. No. ED 98236·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrance Johnson (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court [509]*509denying his motion- for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an evi-dentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule -84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 397 S.W.3d 508, 2013 WL 1135777, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 334 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

397 S.W.3d 508 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.