Johnson v. State

46 S.W.3d 660, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 920, 2001 WL 605094
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2010
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 2001·No. No. ED 77976·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Bryan K. Johnson, appeals the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues the motion court erred in denying Movant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to strike an unqualified juror.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 46 S.W.3d 660, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 920, 2001 WL 605094 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

46 S.W.3d 660 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.