Johnson v. State
9 S.W.3d 645, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2071, 1999 WL 846113
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 229 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the judgment denying his rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 645, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2071, 1999 WL 846113 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).
9 S.W.3d 645 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.