Johnson v. State

991 S.W.2d 192, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 631
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 229
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 1999·No. No. 74806·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Randall Johnson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing on remand from this Court. Johnson v. State, 962 S.W.2d 892 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 991 S.W.2d 192, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 631 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

991 S.W.2d 192 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
962 S.W.2d 892 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)