Johnson v. State
908 S.W.2d 168, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1778, 1995 WL 606967
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 287 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended written opinion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 908 S.W.2d 168, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1778, 1995 WL 606967 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
908 S.W.2d 168 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.