Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Johnson v. State

848 S.W.2d 33, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 60

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 19, 1993

DocketNo. 618687

StatusPublished

This text of 848 S.W.2d 33 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 848 S.W.2d 33, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 60 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

848 S.W.2d 33, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-moctapp-1993.