Johnson v. State

886 S.W.2d 230, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1756, 1994 WL 614016
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 575
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 8, 1994·No. No. 65368·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 886 S.W.2d 230, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1756, 1994 WL 614016 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

886 S.W.2d 230 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.