Johnson v. State
876 S.W.2d 687, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 528, 1994 WL 97736
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Cortez Johnson, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 876 S.W.2d 687, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 528, 1994 WL 97736 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
876 S.W.2d 687 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.