Johnson v. State
822 S.W.2d 514, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1833, 1991 WL 263315
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1264 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion challenging his guilty plea as involuntary due to ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 822 S.W.2d 514, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1833, 1991 WL 263315 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).
822 S.W.2d 514 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.