Johnson - Parks v. D.C. Chartered Health Plan

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedAugust 24, 2011
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-1492
StatusPublished

This text of Johnson - Parks v. D.C. Chartered Health Plan (Johnson - Parks v. D.C. Chartered Health Plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson - Parks v. D.C. Chartered Health Plan, (D.D.C. 2011).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) VALERIE JOHNSON-PARKS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1492 (RLW) ) D.C. CHARTERED HEALTH PLAN, ) ) Defendant. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

When Plaintiff commenced this case, it was assigned to the Honorable Rosemary M.

Collyer. See Compl. at 1, ECF No. 1. However, on January 19, 2011, this case was reassigned

to the undersigned. Subsequently, Plaintiff moved for reconsideration of Judge Collyer’s partial

dismissal of the case. See Pl.’s Mot. for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Retaliation Claim, ECF

No. 27.

The undersigned is loath to reconsider the ruling of his colleague. See, e g., Fujisawa

Pharm. Co., Ltd. v. Kapoor, 115 F.3d 1332, 1339 (7th Cir. 1997) (“The doctrine of law of the

case requires the second judge in a case in which there has been a reassignment to abide by the

rulings of the first judge unless some new development, such as a new appellate decision,

convinces him that his predecessor’s ruling was incorrect.”). The Local Civil Rules of this

District Court permit a judge to “transfer directly all or part of any case on the judge’s docket to

any consenting judge.” D.D.C. LCvR 40.6(a) (emphasis added). Therefore, having received the

consent of Judge Collyer, the undersigned will transfer to her the motion for reconsideration.

The Local Civil Rules also provide that such transfer may only be made “upon written advice to the Calendar and Case Management Committee.” Id. Such advice will be provided by the Clerk

of the Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Retaliation

Claim, ECF No. 27, is TRANSFERRED to the Honorable Rosemary M. Collyer; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall advise the Calendar and Case

Management Committee of this transfer.

SO ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2011.

/s/ ROBERT L. WIKLINS United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson - Parks v. D.C. Chartered Health Plan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-parks-v-dc-chartered-health-plan-dcd-2011.