J.L. Manta, Inc. v. Braun

Supreme Court of Minnesota

J.L. Manta, Inc. v. Braun

380 N.W.2d 126, 1986 Minn. LEXIS 910

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 17, 1986

DocketNos. C1-85-821, C4-85-957

StatusPublished

This text of 380 N.W.2d 126 (J.L. Manta, Inc. v. Braun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.L. Manta, Inc. v. Braun, 380 N.W.2d 126, 1986 Minn. LEXIS 910 (Mich. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of the State of Minnesota, Richard P. Braun, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Transportation, and Sandra J. Hale, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Administration for further review [127]*127of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained. Although the petitioner would seek to raise a number of issues on appeal, the briefs of the parties shall address but one issue, that with regard to the commissioner’s authority pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 16B.09 (1984) to, under the circumstances of this case, reject all bids and begin the process anew.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of the State of Minnesota, Richard P. Braun, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Transportation, and Sandra J. Hale, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Administration for further review [127]*127of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained. Although the petitioner would seek to raise a number of issues on appeal, the briefs of the parties shall address but one issue, that with regard to the commissioner’s authority pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 16B.09 (1984) to, under the circumstances of this case, reject all bids and begin the process anew.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

380 N.W.2d 126, 1986 Minn. LEXIS 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jl-manta-inc-v-braun-minn-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack