Jimmy Dale Hutto v. United States
This text of 511 F.2d 172 (Jimmy Dale Hutto v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
511 F.2d 172
Jimmy Dale HUTTO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 74--3215.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
April 11, 1975.
David H. Berg, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.
Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Before WISDOM, BELL and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
The opinion of this court dated March 7, 1975, 509 F.2d 132, does not expressly or impliedly grant in forma pauperis status to Petitioner-Appellant, nor does it expressly or impliedly interdict the statutory power of the clerk of the district court to require the payment of a filing fee in the civil proceeding which Petitioner-Appellant desires to commence. The cause should have been treated as a civil action initially. It should be so treated now, but no differently from any other civil action. Either the proper fees should be paid or in forma pauperis status must be established according to law.
It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is here by denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
511 F.2d 172, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmy-dale-hutto-v-united-states-ca5-1975.