Hutto v. United States

511 F.2d 172
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 1975
DocketNo. 74-3215
StatusPublished

This text of 511 F.2d 172 (Hutto v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutto v. United States, 511 F.2d 172 (5th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

The opinion of this court dated March 7, 1975, 509 F.2d 132, does not expressly or impliedly grant in forma pauperis status to Petitioner-Appellant, nor does it expressly or impliedly interdict the statutory power of the clerk of the district court to require the payment of a filing fee in the civil proceeding which Petitioner-Appellant desires to commence. The cause should have been treated as a civil action initially. It should be so treated now, but no differently from any other civil action. Either the proper fees should be paid or in forma pauperis status must be established according to law.

It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jimmy Dale Hutto v. United States
509 F.2d 132 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 F.2d 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutto-v-united-states-ca5-1975.