Jimmy Dale Hutto v. United States

511 F.2d 172, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jimmy Dale Hutto v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 509 F.2d 132
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 11, 1975·No. 74--3215·Published

Opinion

511 F.2d 172

Jimmy Dale HUTTO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 74--3215.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

April 11, 1975.

David H. Berg, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.

Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before WISDOM, BELL and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

The opinion of this court dated March 7, 1975, 509 F.2d 132, does not expressly or impliedly grant in forma pauperis status to Petitioner-Appellant, nor does it expressly or impliedly interdict the statutory power of the clerk of the district court to require the payment of a filing fee in the civil proceeding which Petitioner-Appellant desires to commence. The cause should have been treated as a civil action initially. It should be so treated now, but no differently from any other civil action. Either the proper fees should be paid or in forma pauperis status must be established according to law.

It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is here by denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimmy Dale Hutto v. United States, 511 F.2d 172, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15195 (5th Cir. 1975).

511 F.2d 172 (Jimmy Dale Hutto v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jimmy Dale Hutto v. United States
509 F.2d 132 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)