Jeffries v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.

67 Misc. 570, 124 N.Y.S. 780
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 67 Misc. 570 (Jeffries v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffries v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co., 67 Misc. 570, 124 N.Y.S. 780 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1910).

Opinion

Whitney, J.

Plaintiff, who alleges that he has written an autobiography which “ by reason of plaintiff’s career is of interest to the public ” and of great financial value to the plaintiff ” and “ of immense value ” to the newspaper publishing it, brings this suit to enjoin defendant “ from using the name, portrait or picture of the plaintiff in or in connection with a so-called biography or life history of the plaintiff,” and for $25,000 damages. The autobiography is copyrighted, and a direct attack upon the “ so-called biography ” now being published as a serial by the defendant can of course not be made in a State court. Hence, plaintiff relies upon section 51 of the Civil Bights Law (formerly Laws of 1903, chap. 132), which prohibits the use of any person’s name, picture or portrait without his written cojisent “ for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trfde.” He attempts to bring the case within the statute by alleging that his picture gives defendant’s newspaper “ an increased circulation ” and thereby “ increased value as an advertising medium.” But this stretches the language of the statute ad absvurdum. It ■*penal as well as a remedial provision (see § 50), and iMFt be confined in construction to a reasonable interpretation of its language. In my opinion a picture is not used “-for advertising purposes ” within its meaning unless the picture is part of an advertisement, while trade ” refers to commerce or traffic,” not to the dissemination of information. According to the plaintiff’s construction the picture of a pugilist or president would bring the case within the statute where that of an obscure and quiet citizen would probably not; nor does he, indeed, object to his picture, except in connection with his biography. Motion for temporary injunction denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Habush v. Cannon
2013 WI App 34 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2013)
Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.
273 A.2d 899 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc.
58 Misc. 2d 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Palmer v. Schonhorn Enterprises, Inc.
232 A.2d 458 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Miller v. Comm'r
35 T.C. 631 (U.S. Tax Court, 1961)
Miller v. Commissioner
35 T.C. 631 (U.S. Tax Court, 1961)
Bernstein v. National Broadcasting Company
129 F. Supp. 817 (District of Columbia, 1955)
Donahue v. Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.
272 P.2d 177 (Utah Supreme Court, 1954)
Donahue v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
194 F.2d 6 (Tenth Circuit, 1952)
Gautier v. Pro-Football, Inc.
278 A.D. 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Miller v. Madison Square Garden Corp.
176 Misc. 714 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)
Sidis v. FR Pub. Corporation
113 F.2d 806 (Second Circuit, 1940)
Kline v. Robert M. McBride & Co.
170 Misc. 974 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Lahiri v. Daily Mirror, Inc.
162 Misc. 776 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)
People v. Robert R. McBride & Co.
159 Misc. 5 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1936)
Martin v. New Metropolitan Fiction, Inc.
139 Misc. 290 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)
Humiston v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.
189 A.D. 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Humiston v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.
101 Misc. 3 (New York Supreme Court, 1917)
Colyer v. Richard K. Fox Publishing Co.
162 A.D. 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Misc. 570, 124 N.Y.S. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffries-v-new-york-evening-journal-publishing-co-nysupct-1910.