James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director

Ninth Circuit

James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director

990 F.2d 1256, 1993 WL 98825

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 1993

Docket92-15991

StatusUnpublished

This text of 990 F.2d 1256 (James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director, 990 F.2d 1256, 1993 WL 98825 (9th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

990 F.2d 1256w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James Haynes CAMARILLO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel J. MCCARTHY, Director, et al., Defendants-Appellants,

No. 92-15991.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 3, 1993.
Decided April 2, 1993.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI